VOLUME 18 (Supplement)

PSL%202021 vol14-no01-p12-28-Mikita%20and%20Padlan

SciEnggJ 18 (Supplement) 277-288
available online: 31 July 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54645/202518SupMOY-24

*Corresponding author
Email Address: trizia.edraa@gmail.com
Date received: 27 December 2024
Dates revised: 29 January 2025; 02 June 2025
Date accepted: 06 July 2025

ARTICLE

Exploratory authentication of lactic acid bacteria in commercial probiotic drinks sold in the Philippines

Trizia Angela S. Edra*1, Jennifer Helyn R. Saladaga1, Julianne Jesh D. Villena1, Melizza Jane M. Collo3, Jorge Anton D. Ordas1, and Aimee Caye G. Chang1,2

1Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science, University
     of Santo Tomas, Manila 1015, Philippines
2Museum of Natural History, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,
     University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado, USA
3Ilocos Sur Polytechnic State College, Sta. Maria Campus, Ilocos
     Sur 2705, Philippines

KEYWORDS: Lactic acid bacteria (LAB), 16S rRNA gene sequencing, morphological identification, biochemical tests, PCR, probiotic authentication, milk, yogurt

Food fraud in various products, including dairy products, is prevalent worldwide, raising concerns about consumer health. With their respective microorganism declaration, fermented food products, like yogurt and milk, are probable targets for product mislabeling, adulteration, and substitution. To address this concern, food authentication through analytical methods ensures improved food safety and information for consumers. Hence, an initial assessment was conducted using morphological and molecular tests to authenticate the reported probiotic species in randomly selected milk and yogurt drinks sold in the Philippine market. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were isolated from six different brands and were grown and identified through Gram-staining and biochemical testing. For further testing, the 16S rRNA gene region was sequenced and subjected to BLAST and phylogenetic analyses. Morphological and biochemical tests revealed that all samples were characterized as Gram-positive, catalase-negative, nonmotile, and lactic acid-fermenting LAB isolates. The molecular analyses identified two LAB species, namely Lacticaseibacillus paracasei and Leuconostoc mesenteroides, confirming the species isolated from all the brands are characterized as LAB. However, only one brand matched its exact label, two with uncertain matches, two with nonspecific matches (unspecified labels), and one mismatch. These could indicate possible food adulteration by substitution and enhancement, counterfeiting, and mislabeling from these various probiotic brands. However, inconsistencies may also stem from variations in isolation techniques, environmental conditions, and incubation parameters, which can influence microbial growth dynamics and species viability. Despite these limitations, this study provides valuable insights into the reporting and labeling accuracy of probiotic products sold in the Philippine market.

© 2025 SciEnggJ
Philippine-American Academy of Science and Engineering