The Role of the Editor-in-Charge
Each manuscript submission is assigned to an Editor-in-Charge (EIC). This Editor is either pooled from the journal’s Editorial Board or selected by invitation. EICs, whether internal or external to the journal’s management, is identified and selected due to their extensive background and area of expertise in relation to the manuscript's subject matter.
It is assumed that the EIC has no conflict of interest with respect to the subject matter of the paper, nor with the authors or the research funders. The EIC will be facilitating the review process for the assigned submission.
The EIC has complete responsibility and authority to reject or accept the manuscript. The EIC should be alert to errors and, especially, to fraud and in such cases should recommend outright rejection.
The EIC shall be inviting reviewers, who are experts in the field, by first sending them an invitation with only the title and abstract of the submission. The journal highly recommends each EIC to first consider selecting from the roster of PAASE Research Expertise Clusters before looking for reviewers elsewhere. After the acceptance of the reviewers, the EIC may assign the manuscript to the reviewers via ScholarOne.
The paper being reviewed should be treated with strict confidentiality. The reviewers are expected not to have any conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and/or the research funders.
The SciEnggJ Editorial Board holds a crucial responsibility in ensuring the quality and integrity of the journal's content. Its foremost duty is to uphold the standards of scholarly excellence and ethical publishing practices. This involves overseeing the peer-review process meticulously, selecting competent reviewers who can provide insightful evaluations of submitted manuscripts. It strives to maintain a fair and transparent review process, fostering constructive feedback that aids authors in enhancing their work while upholding rigorous academic standards.
Additionally, the Editorial Board is committed to promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion within the journal's editorial processes. It actively seeks to engage with researchers from diverse backgrounds and geographic locations, ensuring that a broad range of perspectives is represented in the content SciEnggJ publishes. By fostering inclusivity, it aims to create a scholarly community that reflects the rich tapestry of global scientific and engineering research.
Furthermore, as stewards of SciEnggJ, it bears the responsibility of safeguarding the journal's reputation and credibility. This entails guarding against any form of academic misconduct, including plagiarism, data fabrication, and conflicts of interest. The Editorial Board is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of integrity and honesty, working diligently to maintain the trust of our readership and the broader academic community.
In line with its commitment to advancing scientific knowledge, it actively seeks out emerging trends and topics within the field of engineering and science. By staying abreast of the latest developments, it aims to ensure that SciEnggJ remains at the forefront of scholarly discourse, publishing innovative research that pushes the boundaries of knowledge.
Moreover, the Editorial Board recognizes the importance of continuous improvement and innovation in scholarly publishing. As such, it is open to feedback from authors, reviewers, and readers alike, constantly seeking ways to enhance the journal's processes and offerings. By fostering a culture of collaboration and openness, it aims to ensure that SciEnggJ remains a dynamic and forward-thinking platform for the dissemination of scientific research.
Responsibilities of the Editorial Board
The SciEnggJ Editorial Board holds a crucial responsibility in ensuring the quality and integrity of the journal's content. Its foremost duty is to uphold the standards of scholarly excellence and ethical publishing practices. This involves overseeing the peer-review process meticulously, selecting competent reviewers who can provide insightful evaluations of submitted manuscripts. It strives to maintain a fair and transparent review process, fostering constructive feedback that aids authors in enhancing their work while upholding rigorous academic standards.
Additionally, the Editorial Board is committed to promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion within the journal's editorial processes. It actively seeks to engage with researchers from diverse backgrounds and geographic locations, ensuring that a broad range of perspectives is represented in the content SciEnggJ publishes. By fostering inclusivity, it aims to create a scholarly community that reflects the rich tapestry of global scientific and engineering research.
Furthermore, as stewards of SciEnggJ, it bears the responsibility of safeguarding the journal's reputation and credibility. This entails guarding against any form of academic misconduct, including plagiarism, data fabrication, and conflicts of interest. The Editorial Board is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of integrity and honesty, working diligently to maintain the trust of our readership and the broader academic community.
In line with its commitment to advancing scientific knowledge, it actively seeks out emerging trends and topics within the field of engineering and science. By staying abreast of the latest developments, it aims to ensure that SciEnggJ remains at the forefront of scholarly discourse, publishing innovative research that pushes the boundaries of knowledge.
Moreover, the Editorial Board recognizes the importance of continuous improvement and innovation in scholarly publishing. As such, it is open to feedback from authors, reviewers, and readers alike, constantly seeking ways to enhance the journal's processes and offerings. By fostering a culture of collaboration and openness, it aims to ensure that SciEnggJ remains a dynamic and forward-thinking platform for the dissemination of scientific research.
Inclusion to the Editorial Board
The Co-Editors, PAASE Officials, and the PAASE Board of Directors discuss the possible inclusion of PAASE REC members into the Editorial Board. These nominees are judged based on their research rigor, level of mastery in their chosen field of expertise, and their demonstrated leadership in academic publication.
The Co-Editors may also nominate non-PAASE members who perform outstandingly as EIC of the journal. The Co-Editors shall discuss their nominated non-PAASE EIC with the PAASE Board of Directors and seek their approval in (1) accepting them as conditional members of PAASE pending their compliance with membership rules and (2) including them in the SciEnggJ Editorial Board.
© 2024 SciEnggJ
Philippine-American Academy of Science and Engineering